Showcase

A Comparison of Global Agricultural Monitoring Systems and Gaps

Eight global and regional agricultural monitoring systems were systemically compared. The study identified critical gaps in cropland maps, crop calendars, and meteorological data.
1-s2.0-S0308521X17312027-gr3_lrg
The level of importance of different types of information for agricultural monitoring (Figure 3)

Liangzhi You from IFPRI participated in a global study systemically comparing eight agricultural monitoring and early warning systems. The study, published in Agricultural Systems, highlighted the gaps in data, especially cropland maps, crop calendars, and meteorological data viewed as the most critical. New sources of remote sensing data, greater data sharing and new sources of information were identified to improve the overall performance of agricultural monitoring information.

 

Abstract
Global and regional scale agricultural monitoring systems aim to provide up-to-date information regarding food production to different actors and decision makers in support of global and national food security. To help reduce price volatility of the kind experienced between 2007 and 2011, a global system of agricultural monitoring systems is needed to ensure the coordinated flow of information in a timely manner for early warning purposes. A number of systems now exist that fill this role. This paper provides an overview of the eight main global and regional scale agricultural monitoring systems currently in operation and compares them based on the input data and models used, the outputs produced and other characteristics such as the role of the analyst, their interaction with other systems and the geographical scale at which they operate. Despite improvements in access to high-resolution satellite imagery over the last decade and the use of numerous remote-sensing based products by the different systems, there are still fundamental gaps. Based on a questionnaire, discussions with the system experts and the literature, we present the main gaps in the data and in the methods. Finally, we propose some recommendations for addressing these gaps through ongoing improvements in remote sensing, harnessing new and innovative data streams and the continued sharing of more and more data.

Fritz, Steffen, Linda See, Juan Carlos Laso Bayas, François Waldner, Damien Jacques, Inbal Becker-Reshef, Alyssa Whitcraft et al. “A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps.” Agricultural Systems (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.05.010